Uh, if it was an actual 340b vial, then no. If it was a vial bought by a 340b facility but not at the 340b price, then you should get credit (not a 340b vial then). Academic centers especially can have a mix. The hospital purchases for their own infusion centers, but then the physicians group (still with the university name in it) can have their own infusion center in office on campus. Plus, there’s some 340b hospitals that are not purchasing all vials at 340b price because certain state medicaids are cracking down on the discount double dipping - actually requiring documentation of the price of the vial. Then there’s critical access hospitals which are 340b, but don’t get 340b pricing for orphan status drugs. I’ve been appalled at how many people here don’t understand. Either way, it should be obvious if was purchased at 340b price or notust by the net revenue listed in BI.
THAT BEING SAID, I don’t personally know of an instance where someone got credit for true 340b vials, BUT the posts about sales leadership deciding who gets credit for vials outside of territory & for shared doctors on a case by case basis is 100% true - there is no set rule. To the idiot that keeps posting about proof, that is easily obtained for that. It’s not something that leadership is ashamed of or trying to hide. Just ask them!