anonymous
Guest
anonymous
Guest
I don’t know about the 340b vials, but the part about management making decisions on who gets credit for vials outside of territory & for docs that go to multiple territories IS decided on a case by case basis by management. Go ask the KC & IA RSAMs.
Not arguing that. There are allocation calls that need to be made on a case by case basis because there is no data. The alternative is that nobody gets credit.
But I tend to error on the side that believes they are doing the best they can with the information provided. If you genuinely feel you aren’t getting credit for vials you know are yours, then push on the issue. If you can’t support your claim that you had material involvement then don’t hate on others. If you were the driving force then you should be able to back it up with calls and other activity.
“Sucky” always like to blame their performance on management not liking them. But in reality, maybe their management doesn’t like them because their performance sucks.