Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Guest
How about our great open door policy. Anything you say will always be held against you.
It's so sad what the company is doing. By hiring inexperienced ADP people they are lowering the standards, experience and knowledge of our salesforce. I'm not saying that they are all bad but we definitely have more of these folks ineffective than effective.
Mark my words, I'd bet that 3/4 of the new respiratory and DH Reps will be gone by the end of 2012. The money to hire and train these people is astronomical. When is this company going to get it.
Paychex people, Pharma reps and people like that just don't work out. I can't name one single person with those backgrounds that have worked out.
KC will just never learn and history will continue to repeat itself.
Get ready for the next wave of the rent-a-car, Paychex and Pharma hires. It will be another disaster.
Wait until the reorg below top 10% look out....
Not criticizing, just trying to see if this theory of the B2B guy/gal theory of employing is working out.
Also curious about prior Pharma reps that have gotten hired.
I don't know which was a worse chioce, the pharmaceutical rejects, the Enterprise rejects, or the ADP rejects.
Cast your vote!
I actually think that they're all doing great!
You must be one of them!
Most of them are average at best. B2B makes them no better than anyone else. I'd take another device rep or someone with some type of medical background any day over an enterprise rent a wreck person or Paychex or ADP. I heard that Lowery has another magnificent idea. He thinks that the Avon Lady would be a good fit for the company.
Most of them are average at best. B2B makes them no better than anyone else. I'd take another device rep or someone with some type of medical background any day over an enterprise rent a wreck person or Paychex or ADP. I heard that Lowery has another magnificent idea. He thinks that the Avon Lady would be a good fit for the company.
A fuller brush salesman for cleaning brushes and the rotor rooter man for suction catheters
This is all funny stuff. I believe CL has good intentions and wants to grow the company but I think he's going about it the wrong way. When Dr.'s meet someone new they often like to hear about their background. When a rep can't even carry a clinical discussion tells a physician that he/she worked for enterprise or ADP it cheapens the image of Kimberly-Clark.
I think that CL and the other higher ups need to re-evaluate this thought process. If I was a Gastroenterologist or IR doc and knew you were from enterprise or ADP I would never have you in a case for a tube placement with unfamiliar products (IPK)
Moving forward the company really needs to create an image that we are industry leaders. By that, I mean
1. Hiring appropriate people for the field
2. Hire appropriate people for sales training in house. The company hires whoever is willing to move to Roswell. Perhaps KC needs to hire someone from the outside. (Not saying the in-house trainers are bad..they are actually pretty good, they landed the job by default though)
3. Require continuing education. This should extend beyond product knowledge. We should be well versed on disease states.
4. Motivate your sales people and pay them appropriately. KC is known to be a lower payer in the device world.
5. Create a comp plan that's easy to understand and truly holds people accountable
6. Offer stock or options to employees. This makes them owners and holds a personnel stack in the success of the company.
7. When possible, promote from within. KC has many qualified candidates for certain positions and at times it seems like this is overlooked.
8. Bring manufacturing back to America. Our products were better made and keeping Americans employed is the responsible thing to do.
You contradicted yourself with #7 and #2 you dolt.
And, just to clarify, the DH trainer did not get the position by default. From what I know,
there was competition for that job, and JS seems to get it. Now the RH chick, again, from what I have heard, is another story.