AB building vandalism and arson


New details have come out that it was possibly management that lead to scapegoat Blame for former employees. There was an inner circle developing and one individual who had the most information leading to resignation of these recently promoted individuals, is apparently being blamed. Security also confirmed they let this individual in, so doubt it was a former known/ disgruntled employee.

The individual Apparently blamed/accused also already has another job, apparently has a STRONG case in both EEOC and Civil court avenues and may be why Alcon is either being defensive, making false equivalents, or flat out intimidating this person away.

We all know the complaints dept located in the AB building had been a hot mess, with about 10 employees all having contributing factors... wouldn’t doubt if this was a joint group venture.

Let’s face it, Alcon has sucked in the last year and Everyone’s had their frustration. I believe there is specifics/details here we just don’t know about and Alcon may be responsible, hence the silence.

Do we really trust Alcon and how it’s been this past year ?!

Hi James!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12345Alcon


Background check is to verify this crazy guy work history and to find out the reason he was fired from his previous job. This idiot caused trouble with another employee at his former job. Would you hire someone like this? I would not because It is obvious that he can not control his anger and will most likely act the same way.

more that people propagate rumors and feed into this garbage. No one was hurt, no fires set , despite rumors, security actually allowed person into building to grab remainder of things, and returned a laptop that security was too ignorant to figure out how to do on their own. Not in jail, not a felon , yada, yada. Believe what you want, you are going to anyway.
 


Background check is to verify this crazy guy work history and to find out the reason he was fired from his previous job. This idiot caused trouble with another employee at his former job. Would you hire someone like this? I would not because It is obvious that he can not control his anger and will most likely act the same way.

You Kayla, also got a job because of this individual as well. And they didn’t falsify records, jumped through this ass to pick up the slack of a lead that just booked records all day and answered phone one day a week. Had had enough of it, and gave up on work after disability bull.

To say vandalism, arson or implied violence. Is purely rumor garbage.
 




You Kayla, also got a job because of this individual as well. And they didn’t falsify records, jumped through this ass to pick up the slack of a lead that just booked records all day and answered phone one day a week. Had had enough of it, and gave up on work after disability bull.

To say vandalism, arson or implied violence. Is purely rumor garbage.[/

have you seen the police report? It is a public record and it actually has a beautiful mugshot of the criminal as well as a description if everything he did. So, what you are saying makes no sense. I will be more than happy to post a copy of the report if you want to.
 


You Kayla, also got a job because of this individual as well. And they didn’t falsify records, jumped through this ass to pick up the slack of a lead that just booked records all day and answered phone one day a week. Had had enough of it, and gave up on work after disability bull.

To say vandalism, arson or implied violence. Is purely rumor garbage.



have you seen the police report? It is a public record and it actually has a beautiful mugshot of the criminal as well as a description if everything he did. So, what you are saying makes no sense. I will be more than happy to post a copy of the report if you want to.
 


have you seen the police report? It is a public record and it actually has a beautiful mugshot of the criminal as well as a description if everything he did. So, what you are saying makes no sense. I will be more than happy to post a copy of the report if you want to.

Alleged. Didn’t actually do anything. Hence released, and we will see how this plays out, as allegations were found as a response to civil and EEOC filings against Alcon.

you never answered the question... (because you don’t actually know anything)
 




Alleged. Didn’t actually do anything. Hence released, and we will see how this plays out, as allegations were found as a response to civil and EEOC filings against Alcon.

you never answered the question... (because you don’t actually know anything)

Oh, noo!! Thanks for the information. I did not know this was the case. Poor Alcon has a big issue to deal with now
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12345Alcon


I’ve had my rocky road with Alcon the past year no doubt. But claiming this stuff is a bridge too far and people blindly believe ridiculous stuff.

If turning in a colleague at previous job for sleeping with a coworker AND another colleagues husband at the same time and turning it in to HR after witnessing a confrontation in the parking lot is considered harassment. Fine.
She also stole that husband , got knocked up, and has had many problems since.


People believe anything juicy. I swear. no hard feelings and I’d never hurt, threaten, or jeopardize anyone. Never had, not a single colleague can say I did anything to them, property, or otherwise. Yet some how Alcon management claims pretty drastic garbage. It’ll be quite the year , you have my number, I’m obviously not in some cell. Can always talk
 






Here's what I dont follow. An arrest was made. Charges were vandalism and arson. Even if retaliation from management was the reason for firing behind a false falsified data claim why would the arrest not be for simple trespass? It was the weekend right when no one was there but security. Security would have no interest in falsifying charges against anyone. Too many co-conspirators in this story. Not defending either side here just wondering.
 


Here's what I dont follow. An arrest was made. Charges were vandalism and arson. Even if retaliation from management was the reason for firing behind a false falsified data claim why would the arrest not be for simple trespass? It was the weekend right when no one was there but security. Security would have no interest in falsifying charges against anyone. Too many co-conspirators in this story. Not defending either side here just wondering.

There is a ton I don’t follow as well and I’m directly impacted. I tried returning a laptop that I’ve tried to return 3 times now (always gets sent back due to no one signing for it due to Covid.). I have receipts and tracking number. I also verified vandalism occurring months ago when I was working, was investigated, and was cleared ( around April). So why when I was asked to return a laptop, and grab things not returned to me ( like the rug and personal items) was I escorted into facility to grab said things ( Building not broken into or used some badge that miraculously wasn’t deactivated 2 mos after dismissal) To grab my stand up desk I ORDERED, and allowed to remove ( hell security provided me with the cart). Then suddenly random claims popped up DAYS after visit?

The only reason I was there was to resolve things with Alcon before I started my new job. That was the motive. Yet somehow this is a “crime of passion” 2 mos after anything. I currently have 3 lawsuits now against Alcon ( EEOC, Labor Laws, Civil). That they then try to loosely link an ongoing issue they’ve continuously had.

seems to me they are linking two things that just don’t go together for convenience and scare tactics. It’s why any personal link to charge has been removed and all that remains is a police report with just facts.

It’s more nuanced than just a ridiculous and convenient rumor , I’m afraid , but what do I know besides a track record of never doing anything to ANYONE yet the rumor mill runs rampant. I’d know more than any as the one directly impacted and linked. Yet concrete evidence like a boss with terrible reviews gets promoted to a job above what they couldn’t handle with said terrible reviews, 2 leads that were absolutely dismissed and forced to resign within 1 week of notice of lawsuits. And conveniently the dismissed guy gets blamed 2 months after dismissal.

It’s all a hot mess, some of us are just used to it over this past bizarre year
 


Here's what I dont follow. An arrest was made. Charges were vandalism and arson. Even if retaliation from management was the reason for firing behind a false falsified data claim why would the arrest not be for simple trespass? It was the weekend right when no one was there but security. Security would have no interest in falsifying charges against anyone. Too many co-conspirators in this story. Not defending either side here just wondering.

Retaliation was the link to accusing the individual. That’s the issue. Alcons using an ongoing issue as an attack of opportunity to make 2 problems go away. By forcibly linking a square peg to a round hole. Seems to be their motus operandi, doubling down on dumb logic , to protect clear Alcon problems.
 


Let me ask this. Why would someone (me) go through the trouble of Checking In and identifying myself with security, returning a laptop, and asking for remainder of personal items. Only to vandalize and Arson 2 months after the fact that life moved on. It. Doesn’t. Make. Sense.
 


“You Kayla, also got a job because of this individual as well.” No, she got the job because she proved herself by working hard and minding her own business. Some people in QA were opposed to her getting FTE status, but the fact remains she’s a good worker and is not throwing coworkers under the bus with Ethics. Like some individual has. Watch yourself with LW (word to the wise!)
 




“You Kayla, also got a job because of this individual as well.” No, she got the job because she proved herself by working hard and minding her own business. Some people in QA were opposed to her getting FTE status, but the fact remains she’s a good worker and is not throwing coworkers under the bus with Ethics. Like some individual has. Watch yourself with LW (word to the wise!)

LW is one of the biggest troublemakers I have worked with, and doesn't do anything beyond the minimum.
 


Absolutely accurate. It’s her “training” that led to inaccuracies with pharma complaints. My workload doubled between reporting for Visioncare AND Pharma. The only employee asked to do both reportables. And never even mentioned the 24 hour notice to IQVIA/Argus at 1st. I was asked to do 50-60 records a day. Why I worked 10-12 hours a day through lunch after just returning from disability leave, and dealing with an ill father.

Apparently sand bagging, being sour all the time, throwing others under the bus, is a “pat on the back” at Alcon. Seems to be the only people they keep around there, LW, TA, JS

I can’t believe her islamaphobic rants and anti Sre comments didn’t get her fired.

LW is a real class act / sarcasm... paper thin phony and bare minimum effort. You all HAVE to be sinking in workload now. Good luck, Life improved drastically since leaving!

Reap what you sow!
 



Write your reply...